top of page

Why governments need to treat fraud like cyberwarfare, not accounting

  • Jan 6
  • 2 min read

Background


  • Fraud has long been perceived as a cost of doing business, a nuisance to be absorbed by banks and consumers.

  • This perception is outdated, as modern fraud blends geopolitics with advanced technical tactics, carried out through criminal proxies to target businesses and the public.


Key Findings


  • The global response to fraud has remained piecemeal, reactive, and inadequate, despite it being a global security threat.

  • Industrialized fraud integrates aspects of asymmetric and economic warfare, inflicting large-scale financial and societal harm while evading conventional defenses.

  • Fraudsters leverage global, industrial-grade tools like bot farms, malware, and cryptocurrencies alongside social engineering tactics.

  • Fraud networks exploit the gap between a borderless digital world and laws within national borders, allowing malicious actors to operate with impunity.

  • Criminals see jurisdictional arbitrage, siloed defenses, and slow cross-border processes as opportunities to carry out their activities.


Fraud as Asymmetric Warfare


  • Fraud subsidizes transnational organized crime and rogue states, undermining the integrity of the global financial system.

  • Cartels and hostile states increasingly rely on scams and insider fraud networks to supplement their core business models and evade sanctions.

  • North Korea weaponizes cyber-enabled fraud networks to circumvent sanctions and generate revenue, causing significant economic harm.

  • Global syndicates partner with militias and corrupt elites to funnel proceeds from victims who are invested emotionally and financially.


Industrialized Fraud and Emerging Threats


  • Fraud estimates range from $500 billion to over $1 trillion, with the costs extending well beyond stolen funds.

  • The same infrastructure that runs romance scams is used for sextortion, drug distribution, human trafficking, and weapons proliferation.

  • Generative AI supercharges fraud, with deepfakes, synthetic identities, and automated phishing dramatically cutting costs and making attacks far easier to scale.

  • Platforms like Telegram host bazaars for malware, deepfake services, scam websites, and bulk-purchased SIM cards, providing a multi-tiered infrastructure of deceit.


Challenges and Gaps in Addressing Fraud


  • Criminals exploit the fragmentation between cybersecurity, telecommunications, technology platforms, and the financial sector, creating blind spots.

  • Jurisdictional arbitrage, siloed defenses, and slow cross-border processes allow malicious actors to operate with impunity.

  • When victims can't get meaningful recourse, confidence in the financial system erodes, and when businesses absorb mounting losses, investment falters.

  • When governments appear powerless, democratic legitimacy suffers.


Sources


  • https://cyberscoop.com/industrialized-fraud-global-security-threat-international-task-force-op-ed/

  • https://x.com/StopMalvertisin/status/2008516459702489352

  • https://www.linkedin.com/posts/mateoportelli_why-governments-need-to-treat-fraud-like-activity-7414433085829697537-V1Un

  • https://www.socdefenders.ai/item/b6ab9006-d400-426d-90f4-12f34a6ba7f6

Recent Posts

See All

Comments

Couldn’t Load Comments
It looks like there was a technical problem. Try reconnecting or refreshing the page.
  • Youtube

© 2025 by Explain IT Again. Powered and secured by Wix

bottom of page