top of page

Title: Italian Regulator Deems Apple's ATT Feature as Limiting Competition

  • Dec 24, 2025
  • 2 min read

Key Findings


  • Italy's antitrust authority (AGCM) fined Apple €98.6 million for abusing its dominant position in the App Store market through its App Tracking Transparency (ATT) framework.

  • The AGCM found that Apple's ATT policy, which requires a double consent prompt for developers to access user data for advertising, is disproportionate and limits competition.

  • Apple's own apps and services can obtain user consent for data collection and personalized ads in a single tap, giving them an unfair advantage over third-party developers.

  • The AGCM criticized the double consent requirement as excessively burdensome for developers, while stating that Apple could have achieved the same level of privacy protection through less restrictive means.

  • Apple plans to appeal the AGCM's ruling, reaffirming its commitment to strong privacy protections and stating that the ATT rules apply equally to all developers.


Background


  • Apple introduced the ATT feature with iOS 14.5 in 2021, which requires apps to obtain user consent to access the Identifier for Advertisers (IDFA) for tracking and targeted advertising.

  • The Identifier for Advertisers (IDFA) is a unique, random identifier assigned by Apple to a user's device, allowing advertisers to track user activity across apps and websites for targeted ads while maintaining user anonymity.

  • Users can reset or disable IDFA through their device's privacy settings.


App Tracking Transparency (ATT) Controversy


  • The AGCM found that Apple's dominant position in the App Store market allowed it to "unilaterally impose" the ATT rules on third-party developers without prior consultation.

  • The authority criticized the double consent prompts required for developers to obtain user permission for data collection and personalized ads, stating that this is "disproportionate" and "burdensome" for third-party developers.

  • In contrast, Apple's own apps and services can obtain user consent in a single tap, giving them an unfair advantage over third-party developers who rely on advertising revenue.

  • The AGCM said that Apple could have achieved the same level of privacy protection through less restrictive means, such as allowing developers to obtain consent in a single "Personalized Advertising" prompt.


Apple's Response and Ongoing Investigations


  • Apple stated that it will appeal the AGCM's ruling, reaffirming its commitment to strong privacy protections and asserting that the ATT rules apply equally to all developers.

  • This is not the first time Apple's ATT framework has faced scrutiny from competition authorities. In 2025, France's Autorité de la concurrence fined the company €150 million for abusing its dominance in ATT consent practices.

  • Apple is also facing similar probes in Poland and Romania, and Germany's antitrust authority is currently testing proposed changes to the ATT consent prompt.


Sources


  • https://securityaffairs.com/186070/laws-and-regulations/italian-regulator-rules-apples-att-feature-limits-competition.html

  • https://thehackernews.com/2025/12/italy-fines-apple-986-million-over-att.html

Recent Posts

See All

Comments


  • Youtube

© 2025 by Explain IT Again. Powered and secured by Wix

bottom of page